Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) | Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $1.35 | $5 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $4.2 | $25 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $2.06/M tokens vs $10.00/M for Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort).
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) generates tokens faster at 54 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 1.04s).
Choose based on your priorities: DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) for lower cost, Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) for stronger benchmark performance, and Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.