Compare/Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)

Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)vsGLM-4.5 (Reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Alibaba

Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.375/M
Output
$2.25/M
Speed
162 tok/s
TTFT
1.24s
Z AI

GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)

Input
$0.6/M
Output
$2.2/M
Speed
55 tok/s
TTFT
1.26s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
Lower Latency
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
Benchmarks (4-8)
GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricQwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.375$0.6
Output ($/M tokens)$2.25$2.2
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)$0.60
GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)$0.82

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
162 tok/s
GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)
55 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
1.24s
GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)
1.26s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
31.526.4
Coding Index
17.626.3
Math Index
73.7
GPQA Diamond
81.7%78.2%
MMLU-Pro
83.5%
LiveCodeBench
73.8%
AIME 2025
73.7%
MATH-500
97.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
12.5%12.2%
SciCode
1.3%34.8%
IFBench
36.2%44.1%
TerminalBench
25.8%22.0%
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)4 wins
8 winsGLM-4.5 (Reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) or GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)?

Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.84/M tokens vs $1.00/M for GLM-4.5 (Reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) wins 8 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 162 tok/s vs 55 tok/s. Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (1.24s vs 1.26s).

When should I use Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.