Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | QwQ 32B-Preview | Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.12 | $0.16 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.18 | $0.16 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
QwQ 32B-Preview is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.14/M tokens vs $0.16/M for Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision).
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for QwQ 32B-Preview. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) generates tokens faster at 81 tok/s vs 59 tok/s. However, Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) has lower time-to-first-token (0.37s vs 0.49s).
Choose based on your priorities: QwQ 32B-Preview for lower cost, Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) for stronger benchmark performance, and Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.