Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | QwQ 32B-Preview | NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.12 | $0.05 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.18 | $0.195 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.09/M tokens vs $0.14/M for QwQ 32B-Preview.
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning) wins 8 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 3 for QwQ 32B-Preview. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 157 tok/s vs 59 tok/s. QwQ 32B-Preview also has lower time-to-first-token (0.49s vs 0.60s).
Choose based on your priorities: NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.