Compare/Claude 2.0 vs Grok-1

Claude 2.0vsGrok-1

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Anthropic

Claude 2.0

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
xAI

Grok-1

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Tie
Lower Latency
Tie
Benchmarks (5-1)
Claude 2.0

Pricing Comparison

MetricClaude 2.0Grok-1
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Claude 2.0$0.00
Grok-1$0.00

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
9.111.7
Coding Index
12.9
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
34.4%
MMLU-Pro
48.6%
LiveCodeBench
17.1%
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
SciCode
19.4%
IFBench
TerminalBench
Claude 2.05 wins
1 winsGrok-1

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 2.0 or Grok-1?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Claude 2.0 wins 5 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Grok-1. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use Claude 2.0 vs Grok-1?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Claude 2.0 for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.