Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) | gpt-oss-20B (low) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0 | $0.06 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0 | $0.2 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $0.10/M for gpt-oss-20B (low).
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) wins 8 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for gpt-oss-20B (low). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
gpt-oss-20B (low) generates tokens faster at 265 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.42s).
Choose based on your priorities: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) for lower cost, Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and gpt-oss-20B (low) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.