Compare/Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) vs Grok-1

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)vsGrok-1

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Anthropic

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
xAI

Grok-1

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Tie
Lower Latency
Tie
Benchmarks (12-0)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricClaude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)Grok-1
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)$0.00
Grok-1$0.00

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
34.711.7
Coding Index
27.6
Math Index
56.3
GPQA Diamond
77.2%
MMLU-Pro
83.7%
LiveCodeBench
47.3%
AIME 2025
56.3%
MATH-500
94.7%
Humanity's Last Exam
10.3%
SciCode
40.3%
IFBench
48.3%
TerminalBench
21.2%
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)12 wins
0 winsGrok-1

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) or Grok-1?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) wins 12 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Grok-1. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) vs Grok-1?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.