Compare/Claude 3.5 Sonnet (June '24) vs Grok 3

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (June '24)vsGrok 3

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (June '24)

Input
$3.75/M
Output
$15/M
Speed
TTFT
xAI

Grok 3

Input
$3/M
Output
$15/M
Speed
37 tok/s
TTFT
0.65s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Grok 3
Faster (tok/s)
Grok 3
Lower Latency
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (June '24)
Benchmarks (1-11)
Grok 3

Pricing Comparison

MetricClaude 3.5 Sonnet (June '24)Grok 3
Input ($/M tokens)$3.75$3
Output ($/M tokens)$15$15
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (June '24)$5.25
Grok 3$4.50

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (June '24)
Grok 3
37 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (June '24)
Grok 3
0.65s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
14.225.2
Coding Index
26.019.8
Math Index
58.0
GPQA Diamond
56.0%69.3%
MMLU-Pro
75.1%79.9%
LiveCodeBench
42.5%
AIME 2025
58.0%
MATH-500
69.5%87.0%
Humanity's Last Exam
3.7%5.1%
SciCode
31.6%36.8%
IFBench
46.9%
TerminalBench
11.4%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (June '24)1 wins
11 winsGrok 3

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (June '24) or Grok 3?

Grok 3 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $6.00/M tokens vs $6.56/M for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (June '24).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Grok 3 wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (June '24). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Grok 3 generates tokens faster at 37 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. Claude 3.5 Sonnet (June '24) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.65s).

When should I use Claude 3.5 Sonnet (June '24) vs Grok 3?

Choose based on your priorities: Grok 3 for lower cost, Grok 3 for stronger benchmark performance, and Grok 3 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.