Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning) | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $1.25 | $1.675 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $5 | $4.7 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $2.19/M tokens vs $2.43/M for DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25).
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) wins 8 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 108 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. However, DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.59s).
Choose based on your priorities: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) for stronger benchmark performance, and Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.