Compare/Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 3

Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)vsGrok 3

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Anthropic

Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)

Input
$3/M
Output
$15/M
Speed
45 tok/s
TTFT
0.96s
xAI

Grok 3

Input
$3/M
Output
$15/M
Speed
70 tok/s
TTFT
0.33s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Grok 3
Lower Latency
Grok 3
Benchmarks (8-4)
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricClaude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)Grok 3
Input ($/M tokens)$3$3
Output ($/M tokens)$15$15
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)$4.50
Grok 3$4.50

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)
45 tok/s
Grok 3
70 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)
0.96s
Grok 3
0.33s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
37.125.2
Coding Index
33.519.8
Math Index
37.058.0
GPQA Diamond
72.7%69.3%
MMLU-Pro
86.0%79.9%
LiveCodeBench
59.0%42.5%
AIME 2025
37.0%58.0%
MATH-500
87.0%
Humanity's Last Exam
7.1%5.1%
SciCode
42.8%36.8%
IFBench
42.7%46.9%
TerminalBench
28.8%11.4%
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)8 wins
4 winsGrok 3

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) or Grok 3?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) wins 8 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for Grok 3. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Grok 3 generates tokens faster at 70 tok/s vs 45 tok/s. However, Grok 3 has lower time-to-first-token (0.33s vs 0.96s).

When should I use Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 3?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Grok 3 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.