Compare/claude-4-6-sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

claude-4-6-sonnetvsGemini 2.5 Pro

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

claude-4-6-sonnet

Input
Output
Speed
TTFT
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Input
$1.25/M
Output
$10/M
Speed
131 tok/s
TTFT
23.22s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Faster (tok/s)
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Lower Latency
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Benchmarks (0-12)
Gemini 2.5 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Metricclaude-4-6-sonnetGemini 2.5 Pro
Input ($/M tokens)$1.25
Output ($/M tokens)$10
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Gemini 2.5 Pro$2.25

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
claude-4-6-sonnet
Gemini 2.5 Pro
131 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
claude-4-6-sonnet
Gemini 2.5 Pro
23.22s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
34.6
Coding Index
31.9
Math Index
87.7
GPQA Diamond
84.4%
MMLU-Pro
86.2%
LiveCodeBench
80.1%
AIME 2025
87.7%
MATH-500
96.7%
Humanity's Last Exam
21.1%
SciCode
42.8%
IFBench
48.7%
TerminalBench
26.5%
claude-4-6-sonnet0 wins
12 winsGemini 2.5 Pro

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, claude-4-6-sonnet or Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $3.44/M tokens vs $—/M for claude-4-6-sonnet.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Pro wins 12 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for claude-4-6-sonnet. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Gemini 2.5 Pro generates tokens faster at 131 tok/s vs — tok/s. However, Gemini 2.5 Pro has lower time-to-first-token (23.22s vs —s).

When should I use claude-4-6-sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Choose based on your priorities: Gemini 2.5 Pro for lower cost, Gemini 2.5 Pro for stronger benchmark performance, and Gemini 2.5 Pro for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.