Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) | GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $5 | $2.5 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $25 | $15 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $5.63/M tokens vs $10.00/M for Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort).
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) wins 5 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 2 for GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 61 tok/s vs 55 tok/s. However, GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.57s vs 1.69s).
Choose based on your priorities: GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) for stronger benchmark performance, and GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.