Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) | GPT-5.5 (high) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $6.25 | $5 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $25 | $30 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $10.94/M tokens vs $11.25/M for GPT-5.5 (high).
GPT-5.5 (high) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
GPT-5.5 (high) generates tokens faster at 61 tok/s vs 44 tok/s. Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) also has lower time-to-first-token (1.55s vs 19.21s).
Choose based on your priorities: Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) for lower cost, GPT-5.5 (high) for stronger benchmark performance, and GPT-5.5 (high) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.