Compare/Command A+ vs gpt-oss-120b (low)

Command A+vsgpt-oss-120b (low)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Cohere

Command A+

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
175 tok/s
TTFT
0.19s
OpenAI

gpt-oss-120b (low)

Input
$0.15/M
Output
$0.6/M
Speed
331 tok/s
TTFT
0.50s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Command A+
Faster (tok/s)
gpt-oss-120b (low)
Lower Latency
Command A+
Benchmarks (7-4)
Command A+

Pricing Comparison

MetricCommand A+gpt-oss-120b (low)
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0.15
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0.6
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Command A+$0.00
gpt-oss-120b (low)$0.21

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Command A+
175 tok/s
gpt-oss-120b (low)
331 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Command A+
0.19s
gpt-oss-120b (low)
0.50s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
22.517.7
Coding Index
27.8
Math Index
66.7
GPQA Diamond
76.1%67.2%
MMLU-Pro
77.5%
LiveCodeBench
70.7%
AIME 2025
66.7%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
11.4%5.2%
SciCode
37.8%36.0%
IFBench
73.9%58.3%
TerminalBench
25.0%5.3%
Command A+7 wins
4 winsgpt-oss-120b (low)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or gpt-oss-120b (low)?

Command A+ is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $0.26/M for gpt-oss-120b (low).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Command A+ wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for gpt-oss-120b (low). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

gpt-oss-120b (low) generates tokens faster at 331 tok/s vs 175 tok/s. Command A+ also has lower time-to-first-token (0.19s vs 0.50s).

When should I use Command A+ vs gpt-oss-120b (low)?

Choose based on your priorities: Command A+ for lower cost, Command A+ for stronger benchmark performance, and gpt-oss-120b (low) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.