Compare/DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)vsQwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)

Input
$0.4/M
Output
$2/M
Speed
TTFT
Alibaba

Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.25/M
Output
$2/M
Speed
119 tok/s
TTFT
0.98s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
Lower Latency
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)
Benchmarks (10-1)
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.4$0.25
Output ($/M tokens)$2$2
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)$0.60
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)$0.45

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
119 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
0.98s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
33.930.7
Coding Index
33.716.8
Math Index
89.7
GPQA Diamond
79.2%81.9%
MMLU-Pro
85.1%
LiveCodeBench
79.8%
AIME 2025
89.7%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
15.2%12.8%
SciCode
40.6%29.3%
IFBench
57.0%44.5%
TerminalBench
30.3%10.6%
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)10 wins
1 winsQwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) or Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)?

Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.69/M tokens vs $0.80/M for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) wins 10 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 119 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.98s).

When should I use DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.