Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) | GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.435 | $0.3 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.87 | $0.9 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.45/M tokens vs $0.54/M for DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort).
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for GLM-4.6V (Reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 84 tok/s vs 56 tok/s. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) also has lower time-to-first-token (1.04s vs 1.25s).
Choose based on your priorities: GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) for lower cost, DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) for stronger benchmark performance, and GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.