Compare/EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Grok-1

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)vsGrok-1

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

LG AI Research

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
xAI

Grok-1

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Tie
Lower Latency
Tie
Benchmarks (12-0)
EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricEXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)Grok-1
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)$0.00
Grok-1$0.00

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
16.711.7
Coding Index
14.0
Math Index
80.0
GPQA Diamond
73.9%
MMLU-Pro
81.8%
LiveCodeBench
74.7%
AIME 2025
80.0%
MATH-500
97.7%
Humanity's Last Exam
10.5%
SciCode
34.4%
IFBench
36.3%
TerminalBench
3.8%
EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)12 wins
0 winsGrok-1

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) or Grok-1?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) wins 12 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Grok-1. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Grok-1?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.