Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) | Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.1 | $0.4 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.4 | $0.4 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.17/M tokens vs $0.40/M for Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning).
Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) wins 8 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 3 for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 52 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.27s).
Choose based on your priorities: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) for lower cost, Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.