Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) | Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.1 | $0.1 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.4 | $0.4 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.
Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) wins 9 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 3 for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 344 tok/s vs 51 tok/s. However, Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.25s vs 0.36s).
Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.