Compare/Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) vs o3

Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)vso3

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Google

Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
OpenAI

o3

Input
$2/M
Output
$8/M
Speed
84 tok/s
TTFT
6.84s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
o3
Lower Latency
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
Benchmarks (3-9)
o3

Pricing Comparison

MetricGemma 4 31B (Reasoning)o3
Input ($/M tokens)$0$2
Output ($/M tokens)$0$8
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)$0.00
o3$2.80

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
o3
84 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
o3
6.84s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
38.4
Coding Index
38.4
Math Index
88.3
GPQA Diamond
85.7%82.7%
MMLU-Pro
85.3%
LiveCodeBench
80.8%
AIME 2025
88.3%
MATH-500
99.2%
Humanity's Last Exam
22.7%20.0%
SciCode
41.0%
IFBench
75.6%71.4%
TerminalBench
37.1%
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)3 wins
9 winso3

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) or o3?

Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $3.50/M for o3.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

o3 wins 9 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 3 for Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

o3 generates tokens faster at 84 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 6.84s).

When should I use Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) vs o3?

Choose based on your priorities: Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) for lower cost, o3 for stronger benchmark performance, and o3 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.