Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GLM-4.5V (Reasoning) | Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.6 | $0.45 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1.8 | $1.8 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.79/M tokens vs $0.90/M for GLM-4.5V (Reasoning).
It's a tie — both models win 6 benchmarks each across 12 evaluated categories. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 68 tok/s vs 52 tok/s. GLM-4.5V (Reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (1.08s vs 1.23s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, both perform similarly on benchmarks, and Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.