Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GLM-4.5V (Reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.6 | $0.3 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1.8 | $1.8 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.68/M tokens vs $0.90/M for GLM-4.5V (Reasoning).
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for GLM-4.5V (Reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct generates tokens faster at 67 tok/s vs 52 tok/s. GLM-4.5V (Reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (1.08s vs 1.70s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct for lower cost, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.