Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) | Llama 3 Instruct 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.6 | $0.58 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1.8 | $1.745 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Llama 3 Instruct 70B is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.87/M tokens vs $0.90/M for GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning).
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) wins 8 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for Llama 3 Instruct 70B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 69 tok/s vs 40 tok/s. However, Llama 3 Instruct 70B has lower time-to-first-token (0.48s vs 26.97s).
Choose based on your priorities: Llama 3 Instruct 70B for lower cost, GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.