Compare/GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)

GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)vsQwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Z AI

GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.6/M
Output
$1.8/M
Speed
53 tok/s
TTFT
27.09s
Alibaba

Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.45/M
Output
$1.8/M
Speed
68 tok/s
TTFT
1.23s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)
Lower Latency
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)
Benchmarks (2-10)
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricGLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.6$0.45
Output ($/M tokens)$1.8$1.8
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)$0.78
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)$0.63

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)
53 tok/s
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)
68 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)
27.09s
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)
1.23s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
12.717.0
Coding Index
10.814.0
Math Index
15.323.7
GPQA Diamond
57.3%61.3%
MMLU-Pro
75.1%76.2%
LiveCodeBench
35.2%34.3%
AIME 2025
15.3%23.7%
MATH-500
90.2%
Humanity's Last Exam
3.6%4.7%
SciCode
18.8%29.9%
IFBench
28.6%36.6%
TerminalBench
6.8%6.1%
GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)2 wins
10 winsQwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) or Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)?

Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.79/M tokens vs $0.90/M for GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) wins 10 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 2 for GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 68 tok/s vs 53 tok/s. However, Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (1.23s vs 27.09s).

When should I use GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.