Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.6 | $0.28 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1.8 | $1.85 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.67/M tokens vs $0.90/M for GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning).
Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (Reasoning) wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 144 tok/s vs 49 tok/s. However, Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (Reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (1.00s vs 29.70s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (Reasoning) for lower cost, Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.