Compare/GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs Reka Flash 3

GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)vsReka Flash 3

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Z AI

GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.3/M
Output
$0.9/M
Speed
23 tok/s
TTFT
5.88s
Reka AI

Reka Flash 3

Input
$0.2/M
Output
$0.8/M
Speed
56 tok/s
TTFT
1.33s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Reka Flash 3
Faster (tok/s)
Reka Flash 3
Lower Latency
Reka Flash 3
Benchmarks (6-6)
Tie

Pricing Comparison

MetricGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Reka Flash 3
Input ($/M tokens)$0.3$0.2
Output ($/M tokens)$0.9$0.8
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)$0.39
Reka Flash 3$0.28

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)
23 tok/s
Reka Flash 3
56 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)
5.88s
Reka Flash 3
1.33s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
17.19.5
Coding Index
11.18.9
Math Index
26.333.7
GPQA Diamond
56.6%52.9%
MMLU-Pro
75.2%66.9%
LiveCodeBench
41.1%43.5%
AIME 2025
26.3%33.7%
MATH-500
89.3%
Humanity's Last Exam
3.7%5.1%
SciCode
27.2%26.7%
IFBench
27.9%30.4%
TerminalBench
3.0%0.0%
GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)6 wins
6 winsReka Flash 3

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) or Reka Flash 3?

Reka Flash 3 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.35/M tokens vs $0.45/M for GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

It's a tie — both models win 6 benchmarks each across 12 evaluated categories. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Reka Flash 3 generates tokens faster at 56 tok/s vs 23 tok/s. However, Reka Flash 3 has lower time-to-first-token (1.33s vs 5.88s).

When should I use GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs Reka Flash 3?

Choose based on your priorities: Reka Flash 3 for lower cost, both perform similarly on benchmarks, and Reka Flash 3 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.