Compare/GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)

GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)vsGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Z AI

GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.07/M
Output
$0.4/M
Speed
90 tok/s
TTFT
0.67s
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.1/M
Output
$0.4/M
Speed
344 tok/s
TTFT
0.36s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)
Lower Latency
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)
Benchmarks (3-8)
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.07$0.1
Output ($/M tokens)$0.4$0.4
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)$0.11
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)$0.14

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)
90 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)
344 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)
0.67s
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)
0.36s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
22.119.4
Coding Index
11.014.5
Math Index
46.7
GPQA Diamond
45.2%65.1%
MMLU-Pro
79.6%
LiveCodeBench
64.1%
AIME 2025
46.7%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
4.9%4.6%
SciCode
25.5%28.5%
IFBench
46.3%41.8%
TerminalBench
3.8%7.6%
GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)3 wins
8 winsGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)?

GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.15/M tokens vs $0.17/M for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) wins 8 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 3 for GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 344 tok/s vs 90 tok/s. However, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.36s vs 0.67s).

When should I use GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.