Compare/GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning)

GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)vsGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Z AI

GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.07/M
Output
$0.4/M
Speed
90 tok/s
TTFT
0.67s
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning)

Input
$0.1/M
Output
$0.4/M
Speed
365 tok/s
TTFT
3.39s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning)
Lower Latency
GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)
Benchmarks (1-10)
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.07$0.1
Output ($/M tokens)$0.4$0.4
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)$0.11
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning)$0.14

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)
90 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning)
365 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)
0.67s
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning)
3.39s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
22.121.6
Coding Index
11.018.1
Math Index
68.7
GPQA Diamond
45.2%70.9%
MMLU-Pro
80.8%
LiveCodeBench
68.8%
AIME 2025
68.7%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
4.9%6.6%
SciCode
25.5%28.7%
IFBench
46.3%52.6%
TerminalBench
3.8%12.9%
GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)1 wins
10 winsGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning)?

GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.15/M tokens vs $0.17/M for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) wins 10 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 365 tok/s vs 90 tok/s. GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.67s vs 3.39s).

When should I use GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning)?

Choose based on your priorities: GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.