Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) | Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.07 | $0.1 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.4 | $0.4 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.15/M tokens vs $0.17/M for Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning).
Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 93 tok/s vs 51 tok/s. However, Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.25s vs 0.62s).
Choose based on your priorities: GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) for lower cost, Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.