Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.49 | $0.4 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1.9 | $2 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.80/M tokens vs $0.84/M for GLM-4.5 (Reasoning).
GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) wins 12 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Mistral Medium 3.1. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Mistral Medium 3.1 generates tokens faster at 75 tok/s vs 48 tok/s. However, Mistral Medium 3.1 has lower time-to-first-token (0.39s vs 0.78s).
Choose based on your priorities: Mistral Medium 3.1 for lower cost, GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Mistral Medium 3.1 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.