Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.49 | $0.5 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $1.9 | $2 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.84/M tokens vs $0.88/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct.
GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) wins 12 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct generates tokens faster at 154 tok/s vs 48 tok/s. GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.78s vs 0.98s).
Choose based on your priorities: GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) for lower cost, GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.