Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GPT-4o (March 2025, chatgpt-4o-latest) | Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0 | $0.16 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0 | $0.16 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
GPT-4o (March 2025, chatgpt-4o-latest) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $0.16/M for Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision).
GPT-4o (March 2025, chatgpt-4o-latest) wins 8 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) generates tokens faster at 81 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. GPT-4o (March 2025, chatgpt-4o-latest) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.37s).
Choose based on your priorities: GPT-4o (March 2025, chatgpt-4o-latest) for lower cost, GPT-4o (March 2025, chatgpt-4o-latest) for stronger benchmark performance, and Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.