Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GPT-4o (ChatGPT) | Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0 | $0.16 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0 | $0.16 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
GPT-4o (ChatGPT) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $0.16/M for Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision).
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for GPT-4o (ChatGPT). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) generates tokens faster at 81 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. GPT-4o (ChatGPT) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.37s).
Choose based on your priorities: GPT-4o (ChatGPT) for lower cost, Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) for stronger benchmark performance, and Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.