Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GPT-4o (ChatGPT) | Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0 | $0.58 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0 | $0.71 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
GPT-4o (ChatGPT) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $0.64/M for Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B.
Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B wins 8 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 4 for GPT-4o (ChatGPT). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B generates tokens faster at 99 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. GPT-4o (ChatGPT) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.49s).
Choose based on your priorities: GPT-4o (ChatGPT) for lower cost, Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B for stronger benchmark performance, and Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.