Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GPT-4o mini | Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.15 | $0.2 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.6 | $0.6 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
GPT-4o mini is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.26/M tokens vs $0.30/M for Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct.
GPT-4o mini wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct generates tokens faster at 56 tok/s vs 49 tok/s. However, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct has lower time-to-first-token (0.26s vs 0.51s).
Choose based on your priorities: GPT-4o mini for lower cost, GPT-4o mini for stronger benchmark performance, and Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.