Compare/GPT-5.5 (low) vs Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)

GPT-5.5 (low)vsLlama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

OpenAI

GPT-5.5 (low)

Input
$5/M
Output
$30/M
Speed
TTFT
Meta

Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)

Input
$0.245/M
Output
$0.245/M
Speed
87 tok/s
TTFT
0.48s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)
Faster (tok/s)
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)
Lower Latency
GPT-5.5 (low)
Benchmarks (7-5)
GPT-5.5 (low)

Pricing Comparison

MetricGPT-5.5 (low)Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)
Input ($/M tokens)$5$0.245
Output ($/M tokens)$30$0.245
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
GPT-5.5 (low)$8.00
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)$0.27

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
GPT-5.5 (low)
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)
87 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
GPT-5.5 (low)
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)
0.48s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
50.88.7
Coding Index
52.14.3
Math Index
1.7
GPQA Diamond
91.0%22.1%
MMLU-Pro
46.4%
LiveCodeBench
11.0%
AIME 2025
1.7%
MATH-500
51.6%
Humanity's Last Exam
31.0%5.2%
SciCode
51.6%11.2%
IFBench
64.4%30.4%
TerminalBench
52.3%0.8%
GPT-5.5 (low)7 wins
5 winsLlama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 (low) or Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)?

Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.24/M tokens vs $11.25/M for GPT-5.5 (low).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

GPT-5.5 (low) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) generates tokens faster at 87 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. GPT-5.5 (low) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.48s).

When should I use GPT-5.5 (low) vs Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)?

Choose based on your priorities: Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) for lower cost, GPT-5.5 (low) for stronger benchmark performance, and Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.