Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (xhigh) | Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $5 | $0.245 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $30 | $0.245 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.24/M tokens vs $11.25/M for GPT-5.5 (xhigh).
GPT-5.5 (xhigh) wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) generates tokens faster at 87 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. GPT-5.5 (xhigh) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.48s).
Choose based on your priorities: Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) for lower cost, GPT-5.5 (xhigh) for stronger benchmark performance, and Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.