Compare/Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)

Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)vsLlama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

IBM

Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.03/M
Output
$0.25/M
Speed
380 tok/s
TTFT
20.30s
Meta

Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)

Input
$0.245/M
Output
$0.245/M
Speed
85 tok/s
TTFT
0.46s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)
Lower Latency
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)
Benchmarks (6-6)
Tie

Pricing Comparison

MetricGranite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)
Input ($/M tokens)$0.03$0.245
Output ($/M tokens)$0.25$0.245
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)$0.06
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)$0.27

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)
380 tok/s
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)
85 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)
20.30s
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)
0.46s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
7.08.7
Coding Index
3.44.2
Math Index
6.71.7
GPQA Diamond
33.8%22.1%
MMLU-Pro
46.8%46.4%
LiveCodeBench
12.7%11.0%
AIME 2025
6.7%1.7%
MATH-500
66.5%51.6%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.2%5.2%
SciCode
10.1%11.2%
IFBench
22.4%30.4%
TerminalBench
0.0%0.8%
Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning)6 wins
6 winsLlama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning) or Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)?

Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.09/M tokens vs $0.24/M for Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

It's a tie — both models win 6 benchmarks each across 12 evaluated categories. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 380 tok/s vs 85 tok/s. However, Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) has lower time-to-first-token (0.46s vs 20.30s).

When should I use Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)?

Choose based on your priorities: Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, both perform similarly on benchmarks, and Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.