Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Granite 4.0 H Small | Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.06 | $0.245 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.25 | $0.245 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Granite 4.0 H Small is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.11/M tokens vs $0.24/M for Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision).
Granite 4.0 H Small wins 10 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 2 for Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Granite 4.0 H Small generates tokens faster at 287 tok/s vs 85 tok/s. However, Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) has lower time-to-first-token (0.46s vs 8.69s).
Choose based on your priorities: Granite 4.0 H Small for lower cost, Granite 4.0 H Small for stronger benchmark performance, and Granite 4.0 H Small for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.