Compare/Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B

Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning)vsLlama 3.1 Instruct 70B

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

xAI

Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning)

Input
$0.2/M
Output
$0.5/M
Speed
138 tok/s
TTFT
0.32s
Meta

Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B

Input
$0.56/M
Output
$0.56/M
Speed
31 tok/s
TTFT
0.55s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning)
Faster (tok/s)
Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning)
Lower Latency
Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning)
Benchmarks (11-1)
Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

MetricGrok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning)Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
Input ($/M tokens)$0.2$0.56
Output ($/M tokens)$0.5$0.56
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning)$0.25
Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B$0.62

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning)
138 tok/s
Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
31 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning)
0.32s
Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B
0.55s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
23.612.5
Coding Index
19.510.9
Math Index
34.34.0
GPQA Diamond
63.7%40.9%
MMLU-Pro
74.3%67.6%
LiveCodeBench
39.9%23.2%
AIME 2025
34.3%4.0%
MATH-500
64.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
5.0%4.6%
SciCode
29.6%26.7%
IFBench
36.5%34.4%
TerminalBench
14.4%3.0%
Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning)11 wins
1 winsLlama 3.1 Instruct 70B

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning) or Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B?

Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.28/M tokens vs $0.56/M for Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning) wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 138 tok/s vs 31 tok/s. Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning) also has lower time-to-first-token (0.32s vs 0.55s).

When should I use Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B?

Choose based on your priorities: Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning) for lower cost, Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.