Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | HyperNova 60B 2605 | Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.04 | $0.1 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.14 | $0.15 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
HyperNova 60B 2605 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.07/M tokens vs $0.11/M for Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning).
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) wins 4 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 3 for HyperNova 60B 2605. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
HyperNova 60B 2605 generates tokens faster at 360 tok/s vs 62 tok/s. HyperNova 60B 2605 also has lower time-to-first-token (0.59s vs 0.82s).
Choose based on your priorities: HyperNova 60B 2605 for lower cost, Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and HyperNova 60B 2605 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.