Compare/JT-35B-Flash vs Grok-1

JT-35B-FlashvsGrok-1

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

China Mobile

JT-35B-Flash

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
xAI

Grok-1

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Tie
Faster (tok/s)
Tie
Lower Latency
Tie
Benchmarks (7-0)
JT-35B-Flash

Pricing Comparison

MetricJT-35B-FlashGrok-1
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
JT-35B-Flash$0.00
Grok-1$0.00

Speed Comparison

Speed data not available for these models.

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
36.111.7
Coding Index
28.9
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
82.9%
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
6.1%
SciCode
29.1%
IFBench
42.0%
TerminalBench
28.8%
JT-35B-Flash7 wins
0 winsGrok-1

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JT-35B-Flash or Grok-1?

Both models have similar pricing. Check the detailed breakdown above for input vs output token costs.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

JT-35B-Flash wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Grok-1. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Both models have comparable generation speeds.

When should I use JT-35B-Flash vs Grok-1?

Choose based on your priorities: both are similarly priced, JT-35B-Flash for stronger benchmark performance, and both have comparable speed. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.