Compare/JT-35B-Flash vs gpt-oss-120B (low)

JT-35B-Flashvsgpt-oss-120B (low)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

China Mobile

JT-35B-Flash

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
OpenAI

gpt-oss-120B (low)

Input
$0.15/M
Output
$0.6/M
Speed
232 tok/s
TTFT
0.55s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
JT-35B-Flash
Faster (tok/s)
gpt-oss-120B (low)
Lower Latency
JT-35B-Flash
Benchmarks (5-6)
gpt-oss-120B (low)

Pricing Comparison

MetricJT-35B-Flashgpt-oss-120B (low)
Input ($/M tokens)$0$0.15
Output ($/M tokens)$0$0.6
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
JT-35B-Flash$0.00
gpt-oss-120B (low)$0.21

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
JT-35B-Flash
gpt-oss-120B (low)
232 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
JT-35B-Flash
gpt-oss-120B (low)
0.55s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
36.124.5
Coding Index
28.915.5
Math Index
66.7
GPQA Diamond
82.9%67.2%
MMLU-Pro
77.5%
LiveCodeBench
70.7%
AIME 2025
66.7%
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
6.1%5.2%
SciCode
29.1%36.0%
IFBench
42.0%58.3%
TerminalBench
28.8%5.3%
JT-35B-Flash5 wins
6 winsgpt-oss-120B (low)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JT-35B-Flash or gpt-oss-120B (low)?

JT-35B-Flash is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $0.26/M for gpt-oss-120B (low).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

gpt-oss-120B (low) wins 6 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 5 for JT-35B-Flash. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

gpt-oss-120B (low) generates tokens faster at 232 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. JT-35B-Flash also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.55s).

When should I use JT-35B-Flash vs gpt-oss-120B (low)?

Choose based on your priorities: JT-35B-Flash for lower cost, gpt-oss-120B (low) for stronger benchmark performance, and gpt-oss-120B (low) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.