Compare/JT-MINI vs GPT-5.6 Luna (medium)

JT-MINIvsGPT-5.6 Luna (medium)

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

China Mobile

JT-MINI

Input
$0/M
Output
$0/M
Speed
TTFT
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna (medium)

Input
$1/M
Output
$6/M
Speed
198 tok/s
TTFT
2.97s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
JT-MINI
Faster (tok/s)
GPT-5.6 Luna (medium)
Lower Latency
JT-MINI
Benchmarks (2-5)
GPT-5.6 Luna (medium)

Pricing Comparison

MetricJT-MINIGPT-5.6 Luna (medium)
Input ($/M tokens)$0$1
Output ($/M tokens)$0$6
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
JT-MINI$0.00
GPT-5.6 Luna (medium)$1.60

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
JT-MINI
GPT-5.6 Luna (medium)
198 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
JT-MINI
GPT-5.6 Luna (medium)
2.97s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
18.538.1
Coding Index
50.7
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
67.6%85.9%
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
6.6%24.5%
SciCode
27.2%45.8%
IFBench
36.7%
TerminalBench
18.2%
JT-MINI2 wins
5 winsGPT-5.6 Luna (medium)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JT-MINI or GPT-5.6 Luna (medium)?

JT-MINI is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.00/M tokens vs $2.25/M for GPT-5.6 Luna (medium).

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) wins 5 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 2 for JT-MINI. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) generates tokens faster at 198 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. JT-MINI also has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 2.97s).

When should I use JT-MINI vs GPT-5.6 Luna (medium)?

Choose based on your priorities: JT-MINI for lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) for stronger benchmark performance, and GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.