Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Ling-flash-2.0 | Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.14 | $0.15 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.57 | $0.59 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Ling-flash-2.0 is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.25/M tokens vs $0.26/M for Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning).
Ling-flash-2.0 wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning) generates tokens faster at 103 tok/s vs 86 tok/s. However, Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (1.09s vs 1.47s).
Choose based on your priorities: Ling-flash-2.0 for lower cost, Ling-flash-2.0 for stronger benchmark performance, and Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.