Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $2.75 | $0.84 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $6.5 | $6.175 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $2.17/M tokens vs $3.69/M for Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B (Reasoning) wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B generates tokens faster at 45 tok/s vs 34 tok/s. Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B also has lower time-to-first-token (0.61s vs 1.26s).
Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B (Reasoning) for lower cost, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.