Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) | Gemma 3 27B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.245 | $0.11 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.245 | $0.25 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Gemma 3 27B Instruct is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.14/M tokens vs $0.24/M for Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision).
Gemma 3 27B Instruct wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) generates tokens faster at 85 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. However, Gemma 3 27B Instruct has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.46s).
Choose based on your priorities: Gemma 3 27B Instruct for lower cost, Gemma 3 27B Instruct for stronger benchmark performance, and Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.