Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | gpt-oss-120B (high) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.17 | $0.15 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.66 | $0.6 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
gpt-oss-120B (high) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.26/M tokens vs $0.29/M for Llama 4 Scout.
gpt-oss-120B (high) wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Llama 4 Scout. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
gpt-oss-120B (high) generates tokens faster at 253 tok/s vs 129 tok/s. Llama 4 Scout also has lower time-to-first-token (0.45s vs 0.49s).
Choose based on your priorities: gpt-oss-120B (high) for lower cost, gpt-oss-120B (high) for stronger benchmark performance, and gpt-oss-120B (high) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.