Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.
| Metric | Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) | Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Input ($/M tokens) | $0.1 | $0.13 |
| Output ($/M tokens) | $0.4 | $0.4 |
Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks
Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.17/M tokens vs $0.20/M for Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning).
Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) wins 11 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 1 for Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning). See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.
Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) generates tokens faster at 50 tok/s vs 0 tok/s. However, Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) has lower time-to-first-token (0.00s vs 0.31s).
Choose based on your priorities: Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) for lower cost, Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) for stronger benchmark performance, and Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.