Compare/Mercury 2 vs Qwen3.5 Omni Flash

Mercury 2vsQwen3.5 Omni Flash

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, 12 benchmarks, and generation speed.

Inception

Mercury 2

Input
$0.25/M
Output
$0.75/M
Speed
809 tok/s
TTFT
3.48s
Alibaba

Qwen3.5 Omni Flash

Input
$0.1/M
Output
$0.8/M
Speed
231 tok/s
TTFT
1.03s

Winner by Category

Cheaper
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
Faster (tok/s)
Mercury 2
Lower Latency
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
Benchmarks (7-0)
Mercury 2

Pricing Comparison

MetricMercury 2Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
Input ($/M tokens)$0.25$0.1
Output ($/M tokens)$0.75$0.8
Cost for 1M input + 100K output tokens:
Mercury 2$0.33
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash$0.18

Speed Comparison

Output Speed (tokens/s) — higher is better
Mercury 2
809 tok/s
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
231 tok/s
Time to First Token (seconds) — lower is better
Mercury 2
3.48s
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
1.03s

Benchmark Comparison

Data from Artificial Analysis API — 12 benchmarks

Intelligence Index
32.825.9
Coding Index
30.614.0
Math Index
GPQA Diamond
77.0%74.2%
MMLU-Pro
LiveCodeBench
AIME 2025
MATH-500
Humanity's Last Exam
15.5%7.1%
SciCode
38.7%25.5%
IFBench
69.8%38.0%
TerminalBench
26.5%8.3%
Mercury 27 wins
0 winsQwen3.5 Omni Flash

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or Qwen3.5 Omni Flash?

Qwen3.5 Omni Flash is cheaper overall. Its blended price (3:1 input/output ratio) is $0.28/M tokens vs $0.38/M for Mercury 2.

Which model performs better on benchmarks?

Mercury 2 wins 7 out of 12 benchmarks compared to 0 for Qwen3.5 Omni Flash. See the detailed benchmark chart above for per-category results.

Which is faster for real-time applications?

Mercury 2 generates tokens faster at 809 tok/s vs 231 tok/s. However, Qwen3.5 Omni Flash has lower time-to-first-token (1.03s vs 3.48s).

When should I use Mercury 2 vs Qwen3.5 Omni Flash?

Choose based on your priorities: Qwen3.5 Omni Flash for lower cost, Mercury 2 for stronger benchmark performance, and Mercury 2 for faster generation. For latency-sensitive apps, check the TTFT comparison above.